DKP-1-PREVENTION-001

Preventive Impact Attribution Protocol

1. Purpose

This protocol defines how preventive actions are transformed into measurable, attributable, and non-manipulable impact contributions.

Preventive contribution is recognized only through measurable suppression of activated risk processes, not through absence of realized harm and not through hypothetical projections.

2. System Position

PTL → Impact → Prevention Attribution → Identity → Labor / Compensation

3. Core Definitions

3.1 Protected Zone Z

Physically bounded domain of evaluation.

3.2 Risk Channel Rcᵢ

PTL-derived measurable risk exposure channel.

3.3 Threat Activation Signal (TAₖ)

TAₖ valid ⇔ confirmations ≥ 2 independent oracle classes

Let:

Δ_oracle = max(intensity) − min(intensity)

Two regimes:

3.3.1 Consistent regime

Δ_oracle ≤ ε_consistency

Then:

TAₖ_intensity = min(valid oracle intensities)

3.3.2 Inconsistent regime

Δ_oracle > ε_consistency

Then:

SPDₖ = informational

3.4 Subject-linked Intervention (SIₖ)

Measured Subject action within valid space-time window.

3.5 Suppression Event (SEₖ)

Measured reduction/interruption of active risk.

3.6 Suppression Completeness (Sₖ)

Signals must be temporally aligned:

TAₖ @ t₀
SEₖ @ t₁, where 0 < (t₁ − t₀) ≤ Δt_int

Sₖ = clamp(0,1, (TAₖ_intensity − SEₖ_intensity) / TAₖ_intensity )

If:

SEₖ_intensity ≥ TAₖ_intensity

then:

Sₖ = 0
SPDₖ = 0

3.7 Threat Severity Weight (Wₖ)

Non-negative scalar.

3.8 Attribution Factor (Aₖ)

Aₖ ∈ [0,1]

3.9 Confidence Factor (Cₖ)

Derived from PTL coverage.

3.10 Tamper Resistance Factor (Tₖ)

Derived from manipulation detection.

3.11 Contextual Baseline Field (CBFᵢ)

Audit-only reference, non-reward.

4. Core Recognition Rule

TAₖ(valid, consistent) ∧ SIₖ ∧ SEₖ ⇒ SPDₖ > 0

Else:

SPDₖ = 0 or informational

5. Preventive Contribution Calculation

SPDₖ = Wₖ × Sₖ × Aₖ × Cₖ × Tₖ

PS_subject = Σ SPDₖ

6. Attribution Rules

Aₖ > 0 ⇔ causal linkage traceable

Σ Aₖ ≤ 1

Residual remains unallocated.

7. Justice Non-Leakage Invariant

Preventive attribution shall not create:

• obligation
• liability
• duty presumption

8. Privacy Constraint

Subject-linked intervention must be provable via:

ZKP(SIₖ, linkage) without exposing raw behavioral logs

Raw logs:

• encrypted
• access-restricted
• audit-gated

9. Anti-Manipulation Constraints

9.1 Self-Induced Risk

if linkage(subject, TAₖ) > θ → Tₖ = 0

9.2 Baseline Isolation

CBFᵢ non-reward.

9.3 Pattern Recurrence

repeat(TAₖ pattern) → Tₖ ↓

9.4 Coverage Integrity

low coverage → Cₖ ↓
no data → SPDₖ = 0

9.5 Multi-Oracle Requirement

Single-source invalid.

10. Coordinated Drift Protection

Peer signals non-reward.

Global floors enforced.

11. Output Specification

• SPDₖ
• PS_subject
• attribution
• confidence
• tamper flags

Deterministic and auditable.

12. Failure Modes

• oracle inconsistency (Δ_oracle > ε_consistency) → informational
• attribution ambiguity → SPDₖ = 0
• sensor degradation → Cₖ ↓

13. Invariants

1. TAₖ, SIₖ, SEₖ required
2. No reward from absence
3. No hypothetical states
4. Oracle consistency required
5. Causal attribution mandatory
6. Anti-gaming enforced
7. No justice leakage

14. Simulation Layer (L8)

Defines:

• ε_consistency
• Δt_int
• θ thresholds
• Wₖ weights

15. Finality

Protocol frozen.

Changes require:

• version increment
• compatibility audit
• migration path