DKP-4-EPISTEMIC-TRANSITIONS-001
Epistemic State Transition Protocol
Layer: L2–L4 Boundary
Depends on:
- DKP-1-EPISTEMIC-BOUNDARIES-001
- DKP-1-JUSTICE-001
- DKP-2-FINANCE-001
- DKP-2-ASSETS-001
- DKP-4-CRISIS-001
Override: Not permitted
1. Purpose
This protocol defines deterministic behavior of the system when epistemic state of any upstream output changes over time.
It ensures that:
- previously valid outputs do not persist beyond epistemic validity
- enforcement actions remain coupled to current measurable conditions
- no historical output is treated as persistent authority
2. Scope
Applies to all protocols producing or consuming epistemic outputs.
Covers:
- validity_state transitions
- confidence_state degradation
- consistency_state conflicts
- revalidation triggers
3. Core Invariants
- No output remains operational beyond its epistemic validity.
- Epistemic degradation MUST propagate downstream.
- No historical VALID state creates persistent authority.
- Re-evaluation is required for any state-dependent enforcement.
4. Transition Rules
4.1 Downgrade Propagation
If any upstream epistemic field changes:
- VALID → CONDITIONAL / INVALID
- CONSISTENT → ORACLE_CONFLICT
- SUFFICIENT_DATA → DEGRADED_SIGNAL
Then all dependent outputs SHALL:
- set revalidation_required = TRUE
- enter execution suspension or status quo mode
- prevent further enforcement escalation
4.2 No Persistence Without Revalidation
No enforcement output SHALL remain active solely based on past VALID state if:
- epistemic state has degraded
- new admissible data is introduced
- consistency is no longer maintained
4.3 Status Quo Preservation
During epistemic uncertainty or dispute:
- system SHALL preserve current state
- SHALL halt escalation
- SHALL prevent penalty accumulation
- SHALL await deterministic recomputation
4.4 Re-entry Rule
Resumption of enforcement requires:
- new valid output
- full epistemic metadata
- recomputation under updated inputs
Previous outputs SHALL NOT auto-reactivate.
4.5 No Retroactive Truth
Past VALID outputs SHALL NOT be treated as evidence of correctness if later:
- conflict emerges
- data is invalidated
- scope is violated
All outputs remain subject to epistemic reclassification.
5. Failure Prevention
This protocol prevents:
- authority accumulation from past outputs
- delayed epistemic drift
- persistence of invalid enforcement
- silent degradation of system-state coupling
6. Audit Requirements
L8 MUST test:
- downgrade propagation correctness
- enforcement suspension behavior
- revalidation triggers
- prevention of state persistence
7. Protocol Finality
Once frozen, this protocol is immutable.
Any modification requires:
- a new protocol identifier,
- explicit incompatibility declaration,
- full-system simulation under DKP-8-SIMULATION-001,
- explicit compatibility declaration with DKP-1-EPISTEMIC-BOUNDARIES-001.
Protocol Hash (SHA-256): [to be inserted at freeze]
END OF PROTOCOL